CATT Alert #48: Corruption Makes China Trade Too Risky for
Tigers
April 1, 2007
A front page story in today’s Washington
Post illustrates a sobering reason why China's proposed limited
legal trade in farmed tiger products poses grave danger to wild
tigers.
The story entitled “Corruption Stains Timber Trade”
documents how companies like Ikea and Home Depot cannot make good on
their promises to use legally-sourced wood because of crime and
corruption along the supply chain that comes through China (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/31/AR2007033101287.html?hpid=topnews).
“We're having a hard time getting the criminals to label their
products ‘illegal,’” Ned Daly of the Forest
Stewardship Council is quoted as saying.
“It would take enormous resources if we trace back each and
every wood supply chain,” Thomas Bergmark, Ikea’s global
manager for social and environmental affairs, told The Post.
“We can never guarantee that each and every log is from the right
source.”
The Post explains that unethical timber traders use bribery to
fell protected forests in Asia and take the ill-gotten trees into China,
where factories process them into furniture and flooring to be sold to
unsuspecting consumers across the world who think they are buying
“green” products.
Conservationists and economists both believe that a similar scenario
will occur if China succumbs to pressure from tiger farms to lift its
14-year ban and allow trade in farmed tiger products. The bones of
tigers poached in neighboring India, for instance, could easily be
slipped into legal bone supplies from farms. Even well-meaning
manufacturers, distributors and consumers would never know they were
buying, selling and/or using products made from India's precious
dwindling wild tiger population. As Ikea's Bergmark says,
“enormous resources” are needed to guarantee legal supplies.
Resources that would add costs to farmed products and make less costly
wild products even more attractive.
With perhaps fewer than 5,000 tigers left in the wild, tiger experts
say, the risks posed by reawakening demand among China's 1.3 billion
people are simply too great when illegal trade channels are running
rampant.
Feeling the growing pressure from the international conservation, zoo
and traditional Chinese medicine communities for China to keep its tiger
trade ban in place, two tiger farms held a press conference last week in
Beijing to plead their case. The farms lamented their “tremendous
economic burdens” as a result of the ban, but did not address why
they continued to speed-breed tigers for their parts and products when a
national prohibition was in place.
“If legal channels exist and patients can legally get their
wanted materials of tiger bone for their medicine, the motivations to
purchase tiger bones from illegal sources can greatly be
minimized,” reads a joint declaration by the farms. Unfortunately,
the opposite is true. Wild tiger bone is cheaper to get and yet more
highly valued in Chinese lore. Furthermore, as The Washington
Post shows so well, China, her neighbors and the world face an
uphill battle in fighting the crime and corruption that make trade from
illegal sources altogether too easy.
Look for the tussle over China's tiger-saving trade ban to surface in
the news again as the pro-farming lobby steps up its efforts to convince
China's leaders and the world that tigers should be farmed like
livestock. As more video showing farmed tigers galloping in herds after
chickens thrown from jeeps full of tourists and tiger skeletons pulled
from vats of muddy wine makes its way out of China, more voices are
likely to join in the debate.
The United States Congress is definitely taking an interest. The
issue caught the attention of a March 13 hearing of the House Committee
on Natural Resources, which is likely to revisit tiger trade at another
hearing in early May.
"I am not proposing we dictate anything to the Chinese government,
but what can we do to encourage the opposite conclusion than to lift the
ban?" Representative Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii) asked witnesses at the
March 13 hearing (http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=29).
"This has been a concern for quite some time," Ken Stansell, deputy
director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service told Abercrombie.
Other governments are taking an interest as well. The issue is
likely to surface for discussion in June among the 169 countries who are
parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which has long recommended prohibitions
on international as well as national trade in tiger parts and
derivatives.
They should keep in mind the words of Ikea's Sophie Beckham, who
decribed China's current difficulties in stopping illegal timber trade
to The Washington Post: “Falsification of documents is
rampant. There's always someone who wants to break the rules.”
###
CATT is a global partnership initiative of Save The Tiger Fund.
CATT Alert delivers news related to tiger
trade. If you know others who would like to receive CATT Alert,
please ask them to subscribe at
http://www.savethetigerfund.org/CATT. To view previous CATT
Alerts, change your email address, unsubscribe or learn more about
CATT, please also visit http://www.savethetigerfund.org/CATT.
Correspondence for CATT should be addressed to CATT@nfwf.org.
|